From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com (e8.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e8.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A5C3DDDF9 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:33:23 +1100 (EST) Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e8.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m9GAUIGo015182 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:30:18 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id m9GAXJ7D277404 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:33:19 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m9GAXJ3s028459 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:33:19 -0400 Message-ID: <48F71868.8000507@in.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:03:12 +0530 From: Mohan Kumar M MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support for relocatable kdump kernel References: <20081012233420.GA6240@in.ibm.com> <18674.42140.69339.584403@drongo.ozlabs.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <18674.42140.69339.584403@drongo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Paul Mackerras wrote: > Mohan Kumar M writes: > >> Support for relocatable kdump kernel > >> @@ -1401,9 +1414,21 @@ _STATIC(__after_prom_start) >> beq 9f /* have already put us at zero */ >> li r6,0x100 /* Start offset, the first 0x100 */ >> /* bytes were copied earlier. */ >> -#ifdef CONFIG_RELOCATABLE >> + >> +#ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP > > What tree is this patch against? No tree that I can find has a line > saying "#ifdef CONFIG_RELOCATABLE" at that point. Or is there a > prerequisite patch that I haven't seen yet? Hi Paul, My patch is based on your PATCH 5 of relocatable kernel patchset (which demonstrates kernel can be relocatable). Do I need to resend the patch by generating the diff with your patch5 also? Regards, Mohan.