linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] powerpc: Rename current_stack_pointer() to current_stack_frame()
Date: Fri,  6 Mar 2020 11:27:54 +1100 (AEDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48YT3Z34Spz9sSm@ozlabs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200220115141.2707-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au>

On Thu, 2020-02-20 at 11:51:37 UTC, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> current_stack_pointer(), which was called __get_SP(), used to just
> return the value in r1.
> 
> But that caused problems in some cases, so it was turned into a
> function in commit bfe9a2cfe91a ("powerpc: Reimplement __get_SP() as a
> function not a define").
> 
> Because it's a function in a separate compilation unit to all its
> callers, it has the effect of causing a stack frame to be created, and
> then returns the address of that frame. This is good in some cases
> like those described in the above commit, but in other cases it's
> overkill, we just need to know what stack page we're on.
> 
> On some other arches current_stack_pointer is just a register global
> giving the stack pointer, and we'd like to do that too. So rename our
> current_stack_pointer() to current_stack_frame() to make that
> possible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

Series applied to powerpc next.

https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/3d13e839e801e081bdece0127c2affa33d0f77cf

cheers

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-06  1:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-20 11:51 [PATCH v3 1/5] powerpc: Rename current_stack_pointer() to current_stack_frame() Michael Ellerman
2020-02-20 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] powerpc: Add current_stack_pointer as a register global Michael Ellerman
2020-02-20 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] powerpc/irq: Use current_stack_pointer in check_stack_overflow() Michael Ellerman
2020-02-20 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] powerpc/irq: use IS_ENABLED() " Michael Ellerman
2020-02-20 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] powerpc/irq: Use current_stack_pointer in do_IRQ() Michael Ellerman
2020-02-20 13:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] powerpc: Rename current_stack_pointer() to current_stack_frame() Christophe Leroy
2020-03-06  0:27 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48YT3Z34Spz9sSm@ozlabs.org \
    --to=patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).