From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2A56474C3 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:18:09 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <49416765.5090101@freescale.com> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:17:57 -0600 From: Timur Tabi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Brown Subject: Re: MPC8610HPCD sound as module References: <49411308.1050008@fang.fa.gau.hu> <20081211153158.GF30808@sirena.org.uk> <49413487.9030805@freescale.com> <20081211154411.GG30808@sirena.org.uk> <49413596.6030803@freescale.com> <20081211185255.GA16784@sirena.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20081211185255.GA16784@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Mark Brown wrote: > Well, from that point of view now would be a good time for you to start > backporting your newer code. The concept of having the core wait for > subdevices to probe is now there which was the major win from the point > of view of integration with the device tree. What's there now also has > the changes you wanted without the use of templates in the ASoC core so > you can do a single memory allocation for devices rather than having to > fill out templates and have the core do allocations for you. Okee dokee. I'll start working on it next month. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale