linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juliana Su <js084@bucknell.edu>
To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: XUPV2P + EDK 9.1 + Linux 2.4
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:24:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4941CB50.6060704@bucknell.edu> (raw)

Hi,

I'm relatively new to the XUPV2P. Up until about a month ago, I had been 
working with an ML310. Anyway, I noticed the “XUPV2P update to kernel 
2.6 fails” thread and saw that quite a few people have been successful 
with the XUPV2P; I was hoping that those of you who have been successful 
with the XUPV2P could help me out.

First some background...

I am using EDK 9.1, EDK 10.1, the MontaVista Linux 2.4 kernel 
(linuxppc_2_4_devel), and a 256 MB DDR DIMM. I was able to get a basic 
system (XPS UART16550, DDR SDRAM - MPMC, XPS SYSACE, Linux 2.4) made in 
EDK 10.1 to work. However, I have not had any success getting a similar 
system (UART16550, DDR_SDRAM_32Mx64 - PLB DDR, OPB SYSACE, Linux 2.4) 
built in EDK 9.1 to work. The issue is that, when I turn on the board, 
nothing shows up in minicom. I checked the contents of the log_buf; it 
was filled with junk.

My goal is a system with SysACE support, Ethernet, and the AC-97 audio 
CODEC that can mount a hard drive. It seems like it would be easier to 
create this system using EDK 9.1 than EDK 10.1. Right now, though, just 
getting a basic system to work using EDK 9.1 would be great.

For those of you who have been successful with the XUPV2P, what 
configurations in the EDK 9.1 Base System Builder Wizard and what Linux 
kernel worked for you? Any suggestions as to why I might not be getting 
any output? Would it be possible for me to use Linux 2.6 or should I 
stick with Linux 2.4? (I feel like Linux 2.4 would be better, but I 
thought I would ask anyway.) Also, are there any known issues with EDK 
9.1 and the XUPV2P? I vaguely remember reading about memory issues 
somewhere, but I can’t remember if they were related to EDK 9.1, EDK 
10.1, or both.

Let me know if I should provide any additional information. Thanks!


-Juliana

             reply	other threads:[~2008-12-12  3:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-12  2:24 Juliana Su [this message]
2008-12-12 14:39 ` XUPV2P + EDK 9.1 + Linux 2.4 sarah.ddff
2008-12-13  1:26 ` Juliana Su
2008-12-15  9:04   ` xavier.vvv

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4941CB50.6060704@bucknell.edu \
    --to=js084@bucknell.edu \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).