From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vega.surpasshosting.com (vega.surpasshosting.com [72.29.83.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AD61DDEFF for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:02:33 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <494C10EE.1040305@embedded-sol.com> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:23:58 +0200 From: Felix Radensky MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Long boot delay on 460EX with 2.6.28-rc8 References: <21070179.post@talk.nabble.com> <20081218190208.GC18201@yoda.jdub.homelinux.org> <21087072.post@talk.nabble.com> <200812190856.19482.sr@denx.de> In-Reply-To: <200812190856.19482.sr@denx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Sean MacLennan List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Stefan Roese wrote: > On Friday 19 December 2008, Felix Radensky wrote: > >> Thanks a lot to everyone who replied. I've managed to identify the cause >> of the delay. The board is equipped with 256 MiB Samsung NAND flash. >> Since NAND support is a must for this platform, I've intergated the ndfc >> driver recently posted by Sean McLennan. With this driver enabled the delay >> is present, without it messages appear on the console immediately. >> >> Is this an expected behavior - detection of 256 MiB NAND flash >> takes around 20 seconds. The ndfc driver works fine after boot. >> > > No, 20 seconds is definitely too long. Something must be wrong with the ndfc > driver or the NAND dts entries. > > Best regards, > Stefan > Hi, Sean Do you have any ideas what can cause such delay ? Thanks. Felix.