From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 305BCDDF46 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2009 03:21:18 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <4979EE74.6040306@freescale.com> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:21:08 -0600 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johns Daniel Subject: Re: Common kernel image for e300 and e500v2 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Johns Daniel wrote: > Is it possible -- and prudent -- to use a single kernel binary image > for two similar boards, one based on an e300 core and the other on an > e500v2 core? No, it is not possible. They use different MMUs, and the kernel does not support choosing between them at runtime. > I was surprised to see that the e500v2-targeted toolchain did build > the kernel for the e300 board just fine. Don't know whether this will > always be true? "always" is a strong word, but it should generally work. -Scott