From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79750DDDA8 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:21:34 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <4991A970.70508@freescale.com> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:21:04 -0600 From: Timur Tabi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-mpc: do not allow interruptions when waiting for I2C to complete References: <1233928837-3401-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> <20090210165554.0da8bf7c@hyperion.delvare> <4991A4F2.8030506@freescale.com> <20090210171000.1f45cc2d@hyperion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <20090210171000.1f45cc2d@hyperion.delvare> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Kumar Gala , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Ben Dooks List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Jean Delvare wrote: > To the best of my knowledge i2c-mpc falls into the "embedded platforms" > category and is thus under Ben's responsibility. I don't see his Signed-off-by on any patch to i2c-mpc.c for the past three years (at least). I do see yours, however. You have directly applied similar patches in the recent past, so of course I will assume that you would apply this one. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale