From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e23smtp04.au.ibm.com (unknown [202.81.31.146]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e23smtp04.au.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 432FEDDDE4 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:28:40 +1100 (EST) Received: from d23relay02.au.ibm.com (d23relay02.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.244]) by e23smtp04.au.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n1CBQrnq009074 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:26:53 +1100 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (d23av03.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.97]) by d23relay02.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id n1CBSvi7974868 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:28:57 +1100 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n1CBSdlo022004 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:28:39 +1100 Message-ID: <499407E5.1070705@in.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:58:37 +0530 From: "Sachin P. Sant" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Piggin Subject: Re: next Feb 10: mm/slqb build break References: <20090210194121.80256b72.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <49914790.6050008@in.ibm.com> <49914EE7.7030205@in.ibm.com> <84144f020902100353x4074f342ne4d61483074a06b7@mail.gmail.com> <20090212014503.GD30043@wotan.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20090212014503.GD30043@wotan.suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: Stephen Rothwell , LKML , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Pekka Enberg , linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Nick Piggin wrote: >> Actually, that's not the root cause here. You seem to have CONFIG_SMP >> disabled but CONFIG_NUMA enabled. That's not possible on x86 which >> makes me think it's a ppc kconfig bug. Hmm? >> > > If it is really a valid config, then we should be able to make > slqb build with it... I am not sure if this is a valid config. According to arch/powerpc/Kconfig NUMA depends on PPC64 and defaults to y if SMP & PPC_PSERIES is set. If this is not a valid config then may be the make randconfig rules need to be changed accordingly. Ben should know. Ben ?? Thanks -Sachin -- --------------------------------- Sachin Sant IBM Linux Technology Center India Systems and Technology Labs Bangalore, India ---------------------------------