From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AF87DDDF6 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2009 10:34:52 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <49B06197.8010007@freescale.com> Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:34:47 -0600 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: clean up ssi.txt, add definition for fsl, ssi-asynchronous References: <1236295403-11954-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <1236295403-11954-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Timur Tabi wrote: > +- fsl,ssi-asynchronous: > + If specific, the SSI is to be programmed in asynchronous > + mode. In this mode, SRCK and STCK must be connected to the > + same clock, and SRFS and STFS must also be connected to the > + same clock. This allows playback and capture to use > + different sample sizes. s/specific/specified/ Does the above mean "SRCK, STCK, SRFS, and STFS must all be connected to the same clock", or does it mean "SRCK must be connected to the same clock as STCK, and SRFS must be connected to the same clock as STFS"? -Scott