From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from xceltech.net (mail2.xceltech.net [199.227.119.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45B22DE0E9 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 10:19:54 +1100 (EST) Received: from [70.56.244.175] (helo=[192.168.1.12]) by xceltech.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id KGGV2K-0009IX-N4 for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:42:20 -0600 Message-ID: <49BAE147.4060102@pericle.com> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:42:15 -0600 From: Mark Takatz MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: use generic pci_assign_unassign_resources References: %(message_id_url)s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Reply-To: Mark Takatz List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Ben, We're looking at the fixes you put in place for the various PCI errors and we think this is the solution we need for our system, a GE Fanuc CM6 PPC board (single 8641), but your patches appear to apply either to 2.6.24 or 2.6.25, and we have 2.6.23. Do you know of any similar work done on the 2.6.23 release? Thanks in advance for any help you can provide, -- Mark J. Takatz Pericle Communications Company 1910 Vindicator Drive, Suite 100 Colorado Springs, CO 80919 Office: (719) 548-1170 Cell: (719) 287-5267 Fax: (719) 548-1211 takatz@pericle.com