From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6E8BDDDA2 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:27:27 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <49C1592A.7070607@freescale.com> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:27:22 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] powerpc/85xx: Move gianfar mdio nodes under the ethernet nodes References: <20090318195911.GA31525@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20090318200039.GC8182@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <49C1541F.8040803@freescale.com> <20090318202344.GA9708@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> In-Reply-To: <20090318202344.GA9708@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Li Yang List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 03:05:51PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: >> Hmm, would that imply that the mdio underneath it is disabled as well? > > Technically, yes. In practice, MDIO and MAC drivers are probed > separately. Currently, yes, but that may not always be the case. > I don't see any better solution, should I just leave the core1's > mdio node intact? Probably. It's not as if core1 is going to be putting ethernet@24000 to sleep. -Scott