linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Norbert van Bolhuis <nvbolhuis@aimvalley.nl>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix bug in __futex_atomic_op
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:26:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49E58C10.4080100@aimvalley.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18915.54309.632699.346771@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>


I'd like to understand the implications of this bug.
Obviously applications using the futex system can be affected, but
does anybody know whether GNU software packages suffer from this problem.
I mean glibc (nptl) uses futexes, so does gdb and gcc. will this bug hurt
them ?



Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Richard Henderson pointed out that the powerpc __futex_atomic_op has a
> bug: it will write the wrong value if the stwcx. fails and it has to
> retry the lwarx/stwcx. loop, since 'oparg' will have been overwritten
> by the result from the first time around the loop.  This happens
> because it uses the same register for 'oparg' (an input) as it uses
> for the result.
> 
> This fixes it by using separate registers for 'oparg' and 'ret'.
> 
> Cc: stable@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> ---
> Can anyone see any reason why the FUTEX_OP_SET case can't just do a
> __put_user?
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/futex.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/futex.h
> index 6d406c5..9696cc3 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/futex.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/futex.h
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
>  	PPC_LONG "1b,4b,2b,4b\n" \
>  	".previous" \
>  	: "=&r" (oldval), "=&r" (ret) \
> -	: "b" (uaddr), "i" (-EFAULT), "1" (oparg) \
> +	: "b" (uaddr), "i" (-EFAULT), "r" (oparg) \
>  	: "cr0", "memory")
>  
>  static inline int futex_atomic_op_inuser (int encoded_op, int __user *uaddr)
> @@ -47,19 +47,19 @@ static inline int futex_atomic_op_inuser (int encoded_op, int __user *uaddr)
>  
>  	switch (op) {
>  	case FUTEX_OP_SET:
> -		__futex_atomic_op("", ret, oldval, uaddr, oparg);
> +		__futex_atomic_op("mr %1,%4\n", ret, oldval, uaddr, oparg);
>  		break;
>  	case FUTEX_OP_ADD:
> -		__futex_atomic_op("add %1,%0,%1\n", ret, oldval, uaddr, oparg);
> +		__futex_atomic_op("add %1,%0,%4\n", ret, oldval, uaddr, oparg);
>  		break;
>  	case FUTEX_OP_OR:
> -		__futex_atomic_op("or %1,%0,%1\n", ret, oldval, uaddr, oparg);
> +		__futex_atomic_op("or %1,%0,%4\n", ret, oldval, uaddr, oparg);
>  		break;
>  	case FUTEX_OP_ANDN:
> -		__futex_atomic_op("andc %1,%0,%1\n", ret, oldval, uaddr, oparg);
> +		__futex_atomic_op("andc %1,%0,%4\n", ret, oldval, uaddr, oparg);
>  		break;
>  	case FUTEX_OP_XOR:
> -		__futex_atomic_op("xor %1,%0,%1\n", ret, oldval, uaddr, oparg);
> +		__futex_atomic_op("xor %1,%0,%4\n", ret, oldval, uaddr, oparg);
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		ret = -ENOSYS;
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-15  7:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-14  0:09 [PATCH] powerpc: Fix bug in __futex_atomic_op Paul Mackerras
2009-04-14 16:17 ` Richard Henderson
2009-04-15  7:26 ` Norbert van Bolhuis [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49E58C10.4080100@aimvalley.nl \
    --to=nvbolhuis@aimvalley.nl \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).