From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72C8EDE100 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 04:11:54 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <49EF5DDF.8050208@freescale.com> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:11:43 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado Subject: Re: ofpart: Partitions at same address cannot have the same name References: <874owhoxce.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20090422171030.GH14906@codiert.org> <49EF5391.9050404@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, David.Woodhouse@intel.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > Hi Scott > >> Perhaps "compatible" should be used instead? > > What do you mean? > > if (strcmp(partname, "partition") || strcmp(partname, "compatible") ) > > I can't see the advantages. No, I mean: foo { compatible = "partition"; ... }; -Scott