From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6AEBDDED9 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:16:22 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <49EF7B11.2000006@freescale.com> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:16:17 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: removing get_immrbase()?? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: Linuxppc-dev Development List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Timur Tabi wrote: >> these two are related and seem like we could look for "fsl,cpm2" > > That's okay, as long as you don't break compatibility with older > device trees that don't have that property, unless you can demonstrate > that these trees would never work with the current kernel anyway. All CPM2 device trees should have fsl,cpm2 listed in the compatible of the CPM node. -Scott