From: "Steven A. Falco" <sfalco@harris.com>
To: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: [PATCH] PPC440EPx SDRAM width
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:36:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F06ECC.7030904@harris.com> (raw)
There is an error in the way ibm4xx_denali_fixup_memsize calculates
memory size. When testing the DDR_REDUC bit, the polarity is
backwards. A "1" implies 32-bit wide memory while a "0" implies
64-bit wide memory.
For a 32-bit wide system, this bug causes twice the memory to be
reported, leading to boot failure.
Signed-off-by: Steven A. Falco <sfalco@harris.com>
---
Here is a partial log showing what happens in the
ibm4xx_denali_fixup_memsize routine. This board has
128 Mbytes of RAM in a 32-bit wide configuration, but
the REDUC bug causes the path width to report as "8",
and the memory size to be doubled to 255 MB. Once I
applied my patch, the memory correctly reported as
127 MB.
max_cs=00000002 max_col=0000000c max_row=0000000e
cs 00000001
path width 00000008
row=0000000d col=0000000a bank=00000004
ibm4xx_denali_fixup_memsize 10000000
Memory <- <0x0 0x0 0xffff000> (255MB)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c b/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
index 5c87843..3595c0a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
@@ -193,9 +193,9 @@ void ibm4xx_denali_fixup_memsize(void)
val = SDRAM0_READ(DDR0_14);
if (DDR_GET_VAL(val, DDR_REDUC, DDR_REDUC_SHIFT))
- dpath = 8; /* 64 bits */
- else
dpath = 4; /* 32 bits */
+ else
+ dpath = 8; /* 64 bits */
/* get address pins (rows) */
val = SDRAM0_READ(DDR0_42);
next reply other threads:[~2009-04-23 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-23 13:36 Steven A. Falco [this message]
2009-04-23 13:45 ` [PATCH] PPC440EPx SDRAM width Josh Boyer
2009-04-23 14:05 ` Stefan Roese
2009-04-23 14:40 ` Valentine Barshak
2009-04-23 14:59 ` Josh Boyer
2009-04-23 15:16 ` Valentine Barshak
2009-04-23 16:00 ` Steven A. Falco
2009-04-23 17:12 ` [PATCH] PowerPC: 440EPx/GRx Sequoia/Rainier U-Boot incorrect chipselect number workaround Valentine Barshak
2009-04-23 17:45 ` Steven A. Falco
2009-04-23 20:04 ` Valentine
2009-04-23 20:07 ` Josh Boyer
2009-04-23 20:12 ` Steven A. Falco
2009-04-23 20:55 ` [PATCH] PowerPC 44x: ibm4xx_denali_fixup_memsize fix Valentine Barshak
2009-04-24 4:23 ` Stefan Roese
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49F06ECC.7030904@harris.com \
--to=sfalco@harris.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).