From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 885A6DDE2A for ; Sat, 2 May 2009 06:58:24 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <49FB61CA.9040305@freescale.com> Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 15:55:38 -0500 From: Timur Tabi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] introduce macro spin_event_timeout() References: <1240859144-20893-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: scottwood@freescale.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Kumar Gala wrote: > I wouldn't call it spin_event_timeout as its a bit too generic of a > name for something that is arch specific. Well, I'm hoping it won't be arch-specific forever. I'd like to see other architectures implement something like tb_ticks_per_usec. I'm only tackling PowerPC for now. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale