linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc/uaccess: evaluate macro arguments once, before user access is allowed
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 14:24:15 +1000 (AEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49YBKX1lDgz9sT2@ozlabs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200407041245.600651-1-npiggin@gmail.com>

On Tue, 2020-04-07 at 04:12:45 UTC, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> get/put_user can be called with nontrivial arguments. fs/proc/page.c
> has a good example:
> 
>     if (put_user(stable_page_flags(ppage), out)) {
> 
> stable_page_flags is quite a lot of code, including spin locks in the
> page allocator.
> 
> Ensure these arguments are evaluated before user access is allowed.
> This improves security by reducing code with access to userspace, but
> it also fixes a PREEMPT bug with KUAP on powerpc/64s:
> stable_page_flags is currently called with AMR set to allow writes,
> it ends up calling spin_unlock(), which can call preempt_schedule. But
> the task switch code can not be called with AMR set (it relies on
> interrupts saving the register), so this blows up.
> 
> It's fine if the code inside allow_user_access is preemptible, because
> a timer or IPI will save the AMR, but it's not okay to explicitly
> cause a reschedule.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>

Applied to powerpc topic/uaccess-ppc, thanks.

https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/d02f6b7dab8228487268298ea1f21081c0b4b3eb

cheers

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-29  4:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-07  4:12 [PATCH v3] powerpc/uaccess: evaluate macro arguments once, before user access is allowed Nicholas Piggin
2020-05-13 12:43 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-05-29  4:24 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49YBKX1lDgz9sT2@ozlabs.org \
    --to=patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).