From: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@nortel.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: question about softirqs
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 13:44:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A0B233B.8010105@nortel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090513191354.GB19296@one.firstfloor.org>
Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 01:04:09PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
>> Andi Kleen wrote:
>>
>>> network packets are normally processed by the network packet interrupt's
>>> softirq or alternatively in the NAPI poll loop.
>> If we have a high priority task, ksoftirqd may not get a chance to run.
>
> In this case the next interrupt will also process them. It will just
> go more slowly because interrupts limit the work compared to ksoftirqd.
I realize that they will eventually get processed. My point is that the
documentation (in-kernel, online, and in various books) says that
softirqs will be processed _on the return from a syscall_. As we all
agree, this is not necessarily the case.
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-13 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-08 22:51 question about softirqs Chris Friesen
2009-05-08 23:05 ` David Miller
2009-05-08 23:34 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-05-08 23:53 ` David Miller
2009-05-09 2:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-05-09 3:31 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-05-09 6:48 ` David Miller
2009-05-11 18:25 ` Chris Friesen
2009-05-11 23:24 ` David Miller
2009-05-12 0:43 ` Chris Friesen
2009-05-12 8:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-12 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-12 9:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-12 9:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-12 12:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-05-13 4:45 ` David Miller
2009-05-13 4:44 ` David Miller
2009-05-13 5:15 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-05-13 5:28 ` David Miller
2009-05-13 5:55 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-05-12 15:18 ` Chris Friesen
2009-05-13 8:34 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-13 13:23 ` Chris Friesen
2009-05-13 14:15 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-13 14:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-13 14:24 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-13 14:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-13 15:02 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-13 15:05 ` Chris Friesen
2009-05-13 15:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-13 16:10 ` Chris Friesen
2009-05-13 17:01 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-13 19:04 ` Chris Friesen
2009-05-13 19:13 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-13 19:44 ` Chris Friesen [this message]
2009-05-13 19:53 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-13 20:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-11 23:34 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-05-09 0:28 ` Chris Friesen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A0B233B.8010105@nortel.com \
--to=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).