From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from claw.goop.org (claw.goop.org [74.207.240.146]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.goop.org", Issuer "Goop.org CA" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C11DDDDFA for ; Sat, 30 May 2009 07:09:25 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4A204EFC.501@goop.org> Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:09:16 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] swiotlb: use dma_to_phys and phys_to_dma References: <1243586643-5554-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> <1243586643-5554-7-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <1243586643-5554-7-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Cc: x86@kernel.org, Tony Luck , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Olaf Kirch , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, FUJITA Tomonori , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Ian Campbell wrote: > static dma_addr_t swiotlb_virt_to_bus(struct device *hwdev, > volatile void *address) > { > - return swiotlb_phys_to_bus(hwdev, virt_to_phys(address)); > + return phys_to_dma(hwdev, virt_to_phys(address)); > } > > void * __weak swiotlb_bus_to_virt(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t address) > Does this need to be weak too? J