public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Venkat <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
To: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn,
	tglx@kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	npiggin@gmail.com, chleroy@kernel.org, gjoyce@ibm.com,
	helgaas@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, andreas@gaisler.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] powerpc/pci: Initialize msi_addr_mask for OF-created PCI devices
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2026 16:16:40 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A2FC12D-E147-4402-A464-A1D0ED97C496@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260220070239.1693303-2-nilay@linux.ibm.com>



> On 20 Feb 2026, at 12:32 PM, Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> Recent changes replaced the use of no_64bit_msi with msi_addr_mask.
> As a result, msi_addr_mask is now expected to be initialized to
> DMA_BIT_MASK(64) when a pci_dev is set up. However, this initialization
> was missed on powerpc due to differences in the device initialization
> path compared to other (x86) architecture. Due to this, now PCI device
> probe method fails on powerpc system.
> 
> On powerpc systems, struct pci_dev instances are created from device
> tree nodes via of_create_pci_dev(). Because msi_addr_mask was not
> initialized there, it remained zero. Later, during MSI setup,
> msi_verify_entries() validates the programmed MSI address agains
> pdev->msi_addr_mask. Since the mask was not set correctly, the
> validation fails, causing PCI driver probe failures for devices on
> powerpc systems.
> 
> Initialize pdev->msi_addr_mask to DMA_BIT_MASK(64) in
> of_create_pci_dev() so that MSI address validation succeeds and device
> probe works as expected.
> 
> Fixes: 386ced19e9a3 ("PCI/MSI: Convert the boolean no_64bit_msi flag to a DMA address mask")
> Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c
> index 756043dd06e9..fb9fbf0d1796 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c
> @@ -212,6 +212,13 @@ struct pci_dev *of_create_pci_dev(struct device_node *node,
> dev->error_state = pci_channel_io_normal;
> dev->dma_mask = 0xffffffff;
> 
> + /*
> + * Assume 64-bit addresses for MSI initially. Will be changed to 32-bit
> + * if MSI (rather than MSI-X) capability does not have
> + * PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT. Can also be overridden by driver.
> + */
> + dev->msi_addr_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
> +
> /* Early fixups, before probing the BARs */
> pci_fixup_device(pci_fixup_early, dev);
> 
> -- 
> 2.52.0
> 

Tested-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>

Tested on an IBM Power System LPAR (pseries).

On an unpatched kernel, all LPFC functions failed MSI/MSI-X setup with:

[    0.175139] Running MSI bitmap self-tests ...
[    1.521630] lpfc 0152:60:00.0: arch assigned 64-bit MSI address 0xffff3840 above device MSI address mask 0x0
[    1.536203] lpfc 0152:60:00.0: arch assigned 64-bit MSI address 0xffff3a00 above device MSI address mask 0x0
[    1.536318] lpfc 0152:60:00.0: 14: [    1.521874] 0:0484 PCI enable MSI-X failed (-5)
[    1.536321] lpfc 0152:60:00.0: 15: [    1.536251] 0:0488 PCI enable MSI mode failed (-5)

After applying this patch, lpfc driver probe completes successfully and
MSI/MSI-X setup works normally.

[    0.206925] Running MSI bitmap self-tests ...
[    3.040737] lpfc 0152:60:00.1: 1:3238 Reducing IO channels to match number of MSI-X vectors, requested 32 got 2
[    4.162067] lpfc 0152:60:00.2: 2:3238 Reducing IO channels to match number of MSI-X vectors, requested 32 got 1
[    5.270672] lpfc 0152:60:00.3: 3:3238 Reducing IO channels to match number of MSI-X vectors, requested 32 got 1

Regards,
Venkat.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-22 10:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-20  7:02 [PATCHv2 0/2] pci: fix msi_addr_mask on powerpc and sparc systems Nilay Shroff
2026-02-20  7:02 ` [PATCHv2 1/2] powerpc/pci: Initialize msi_addr_mask for OF-created PCI devices Nilay Shroff
2026-02-22 10:46   ` Venkat [this message]
2026-03-01  6:59   ` Nam Cao
2026-02-20  7:02 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] sparc/pci: " Nilay Shroff
2026-02-21 16:36   ` Han Gao
2026-02-22  6:01     ` Nathaniel Roach
2026-02-21 17:19   ` Han Gao
2026-02-20 10:14 ` [PATCHv2 0/2] pci: fix msi_addr_mask on powerpc and sparc systems Vivian Wang
2026-02-20 13:15   ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2026-02-27 16:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-03  4:29   ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2026-03-03 16:30     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-02 23:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A2FC12D-E147-4402-A464-A1D0ED97C496@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gjoyce@ibm.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox