From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 741BDB70A7 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:37:05 +1000 (EST) Received: from mlbe2k1.cs.myharris.net (mlbe2k1.cs.myharris.net [137.237.90.88]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB43FDDD04 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:37:04 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4A423A0A.2010004@harris.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:36:58 -0400 From: "Steven A. Falco" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Roese Subject: Re: [Question] m25p80 driver versus spi clock rate References: <4A3FEE98.60700@harris.com> <200906231538.40125.david-b@pacbell.net> <4A423750.8080605@harris.com> <200906241633.35571.sr@denx.de> In-Reply-To: <200906241633.35571.sr@denx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: David Brownell , "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Mike Frysinger List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Stefan Roese wrote: > On Wednesday 24 June 2009 16:25:20 Steven A. Falco wrote: >>> Speaking of spi_ppc4xx issues ... I still have an oldish >>> copy in my review queue, it needs something like the >>> appended patch. (Plus something to accept bpw == 0.) >>> Is there a newer version? >> That is a question for Stefan. Perhaps when I post my patch >> to the PPC list, we can move this further along... > > I have to admit that I didn't find the time to rework the driver after David's > latest review. Frankly, this could take some time since I'm currently busy > with other tasks. So it would be great if someone else (Steven?) might pick up > here and resubmit this driver so that we can get it finally included. > > Thanks. > > Best regards, > Stefan Ok - I'll take that on. Please, both David and Stefan send me the latest versions and/or patches you have, and I'll integrate them and post to the PPC list. Steve -- A: Because it makes the logic of the discussion difficult to follow. Q: Why shouldn't I top post? A: No. Q: Should I top post?