From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C848FB7BAE for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 03:51:36 +1000 (EST) Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [143.182.124.21]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52BCFDDDA0 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 03:51:35 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4A71DB56.6090005@intel.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:41:42 -0700 From: Dan Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: fsldma patches? References: <97CDF92A-2FAF-445D-B5B0-1D06884F8259@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <97CDF92A-2FAF-445D-B5B0-1D06884F8259@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: Linuxppc-dev Development , "Ira W. Snyder" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Kumar Gala wrote: > Dan, > > What happened with the set of patches that Ira posted for fsldma? I have just sent a pull request with the pending backlog of dmaengine fixes. Our discussion of the fsldma slave implementation did not conclude in time for me to get a pull request out before the close of the 2.6.31 merge window. I have queued it up for 2.6.32. -- Dan