From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for August 5
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:28:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A7988F0.2010208@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090805201336.fd2de2ad.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On 08/05/2009 01:13 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Boaz,
>
> On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:11:20 +0300 Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 08/05/2009 10:23 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>>> This tree fails to build for powerpc allyesconfig (final link problem).
>>
>> Above is reported for a long time. Is it related to this:
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg921978.html
>
> No, it is this:
>
> powerpc-linux-ld: TOC section size exceeds 64k
>
> It is powerpc specific and the only way we can think of fixing it
> involves stopping building the built-in.o files and linking the entire
> kernel in one go at the end. We just haven't had time (or the energy) to
> try to fix it properly while it only affects the final link of the
> allyesconfig kernel.
>
Ha, OK allyesconfig. Last time I attempted an allyesconfig for i386 I got
me the OOM killer attack on my KDE, half way into the final link.
That's why I use allmodconfig for when I need "try to compile everything ++"
I get just as much compilation coverage if not more. And is faster.
It'll not show symbol conflicts if any exist, though.
Thanks
Boaz
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-05 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20090805172337.b0688db1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
[not found] ` <4A793EA8.50306@panasas.com>
2009-08-05 10:13 ` linux-next: Tree for August 5 Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-05 13:28 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A7988F0.2010208@panasas.com \
--to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).