linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: "wilbur.chan" <wilbur512@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: add kexec support on FSL-Book-E
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:35:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A98317B.6050805@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e997b7420908250909k74208353v81240eebd3d0896a@mail.gmail.com>

wilbur.chan wrote:
> Hi  Sebastian,
Hi Wilbur,

> Recently I've implemented  non-SMP kexec on MPC8572 and P2020ds(2G ram).
> 
> 
> 
> I modified your
> 
> misc_32.S that , I setuped  two '1G' entries  after the "rfi"
> instruction, so that I did
> not  need to setup  mapping for instruction address.
If you send some patches I could add them to my tree so we have
everything together.

> As for SMP supporting,I tried to close one of the CPUs in
> default_machine_kexec,
> 
> and found that , when cpu1  closed  ,and if the second kernel is NON-
> 
> SMP,everything went well.so I added some code in
> 
> kexec-tools, to make sure the 'kexec' process was running on CPU 0.
I remember that ppc64 had some code to suspend and start the second CPU in
the purgatory code. Not sure if there is a generic way for this on ppc32
or it is a book-e thing. Haven't look at it (yet).

> So, there left one problem, I can not start the second SMP-kernel,
> even if I  closed
> 
> CPU1.  Any suggestions?
The interesting thing is where do you hang/crash. It could be possible
that the kernel is waiting for the non-boot cpus to show up and it
doesn't. Have you look how u-boot prepares the cpus and how kernel
disables them on shutdown?


> PTW:
> 
> no-smp ---> no-smp.........OK
> no-smp --->smp...............OK
Does this mean your smp kernel has more that one CPU or just one?

> smp(with cpu1 closed)---->no-smp..............OK
> smpw(with cpu1 closed)---->smp ................FAILED
> 
> 
> regards,
> 
> wilbur

Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-28 20:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-02  1:25 Re:[PATCH 1/2] powerpc: add kexec support on FSL-Book-E wilbur.chan
2009-08-04 19:41 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2009-08-25 16:09   ` wilbur.chan
2009-08-28 19:35     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2009-09-06 14:27       ` [PATCH " wilbur.chan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-11-03 20:01 Add kexec support for fsl-book-e [V2] Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2008-11-03 20:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: add kexec support on FSL-Book-E Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A98317B.6050805@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=wilbur512@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).