From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: "wilbur.chan" <wilbur512@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: add kexec support on FSL-Book-E
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:35:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A98317B.6050805@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e997b7420908250909k74208353v81240eebd3d0896a@mail.gmail.com>
wilbur.chan wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi Wilbur,
> Recently I've implemented non-SMP kexec on MPC8572 and P2020ds(2G ram).
>
>
>
> I modified your
>
> misc_32.S that , I setuped two '1G' entries after the "rfi"
> instruction, so that I did
> not need to setup mapping for instruction address.
If you send some patches I could add them to my tree so we have
everything together.
> As for SMP supporting,I tried to close one of the CPUs in
> default_machine_kexec,
>
> and found that , when cpu1 closed ,and if the second kernel is NON-
>
> SMP,everything went well.so I added some code in
>
> kexec-tools, to make sure the 'kexec' process was running on CPU 0.
I remember that ppc64 had some code to suspend and start the second CPU in
the purgatory code. Not sure if there is a generic way for this on ppc32
or it is a book-e thing. Haven't look at it (yet).
> So, there left one problem, I can not start the second SMP-kernel,
> even if I closed
>
> CPU1. Any suggestions?
The interesting thing is where do you hang/crash. It could be possible
that the kernel is waiting for the non-boot cpus to show up and it
doesn't. Have you look how u-boot prepares the cpus and how kernel
disables them on shutdown?
> PTW:
>
> no-smp ---> no-smp.........OK
> no-smp --->smp...............OK
Does this mean your smp kernel has more that one CPU or just one?
> smp(with cpu1 closed)---->no-smp..............OK
> smpw(with cpu1 closed)---->smp ................FAILED
>
>
> regards,
>
> wilbur
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-28 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-02 1:25 Re:[PATCH 1/2] powerpc: add kexec support on FSL-Book-E wilbur.chan
2009-08-04 19:41 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2009-08-25 16:09 ` wilbur.chan
2009-08-28 19:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2009-09-06 14:27 ` [PATCH " wilbur.chan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-11-03 20:01 Add kexec support for fsl-book-e [V2] Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2008-11-03 20:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: add kexec support on FSL-Book-E Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A98317B.6050805@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=wilbur512@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).