From: Maynard Johnson <maynardj@us.ibm.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Maynard Johnson <mpjohn@us.ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix bug where perf_counters breaks oprofile
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:31:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AA7AE3B.30809@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19111.37067.783017.427206@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Currently there is a bug where if you use oprofile on a pSeries
> machine, then use perf_counters, then use oprofile again, oprofile
> will not work correctly; it will lose the PMU configuration the next
> time the hypervisor does a partition context switch, and thereafter
> won't count anything.
>
> Maynard Johnson identified the sequence causing the problem:
> - oprofile setup calls ppc_enable_pmcs(), which calls
> pseries_lpar_enable_pmcs, which tells the hypervisor that we want
> to use the PMU, and sets the "PMU in use" flag in the lppaca.
> This flag tells the hypervisor whether it needs to save and restore
> the PMU config.
> - The perf_counter code sets and clears the "PMU in use" flag directly
> as it context-switches the PMU between tasks, and leaves it clear
> when it finishes.
> - oprofile setup, called for a new oprofile run, calls ppc_enable_pmcs,
> which does nothing because it has already been called. In particular
> it doesn't set the "PMU in use" flag.
>
> This fixes the problem by arranging for ppc_enable_pmcs to always set
> the "PMU in use" flag. It makes the perf_counter code call
> ppc_enable_pmcs also rather than calling the lower-level function
> directly, and removes the setting of the "PMU in use" flag from
> pseries_lpar_enable_pmcs, since that is now done in its caller.
>
> This also removes the declaration of pasemi_enable_pmcs because it
> isn't defined anywhere.
Thanks, Paul. I tested the patch, and oprofile and perf now play nicely together.
-Maynard
>
> Reported-by: Maynard Johnson <mpjohn@us.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pmc.h | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c | 13 +++----------
> arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c | 3 +++
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c | 4 ----
> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pmc.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pmc.h
> index d6a616a..ccc68b5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pmc.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pmc.h
> @@ -27,10 +27,22 @@ extern perf_irq_t perf_irq;
>
> int reserve_pmc_hardware(perf_irq_t new_perf_irq);
> void release_pmc_hardware(void);
> +void ppc_enable_pmcs(void);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> -void power4_enable_pmcs(void);
> -void pasemi_enable_pmcs(void);
> +#include <asm/lppaca.h>
> +
> +static inline void ppc_set_pmu_inuse(int inuse)
> +{
> + get_lppaca()->pmcregs_in_use = inuse;
> +}
> +
> +extern void power4_enable_pmcs(void);
> +
> +#else /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
> +
> +static inline void ppc_set_pmu_inuse(int inuse) { }
> +
> #endif
>
> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c
> index 70e1f57..ccd6b21 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c
> @@ -62,7 +62,6 @@ static inline unsigned long perf_ip_adjust(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> -static inline void perf_set_pmu_inuse(int inuse) { }
> static inline void perf_get_data_addr(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 *addrp) { }
> static inline u32 perf_get_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> @@ -93,11 +92,6 @@ static inline unsigned long perf_ip_adjust(struct pt_regs *regs)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static inline void perf_set_pmu_inuse(int inuse)
> -{
> - get_lppaca()->pmcregs_in_use = inuse;
> -}
> -
> /*
> * The user wants a data address recorded.
> * If we're not doing instruction sampling, give them the SDAR
> @@ -531,8 +525,7 @@ void hw_perf_disable(void)
> * Check if we ever enabled the PMU on this cpu.
> */
> if (!cpuhw->pmcs_enabled) {
> - if (ppc_md.enable_pmcs)
> - ppc_md.enable_pmcs();
> + ppc_enable_pmcs();
> cpuhw->pmcs_enabled = 1;
> }
>
> @@ -594,7 +587,7 @@ void hw_perf_enable(void)
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr[2] & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr[1]);
> if (cpuhw->n_counters == 0)
> - perf_set_pmu_inuse(0);
> + ppc_set_pmu_inuse(0);
> goto out_enable;
> }
>
> @@ -627,7 +620,7 @@ void hw_perf_enable(void)
> * bit set and set the hardware counters to their initial values.
> * Then unfreeze the counters.
> */
> - perf_set_pmu_inuse(1);
> + ppc_set_pmu_inuse(1);
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr[2] & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr[1]);
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, (cpuhw->mmcr[0] & ~(MMCR0_PMC1CE | MMCR0_PMCjCE))
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
> index f41aec8..956ab33 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include <asm/prom.h>
> #include <asm/machdep.h>
> #include <asm/smp.h>
> +#include <asm/pmc.h>
>
> #include "cacheinfo.h"
>
> @@ -123,6 +124,8 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(char, pmcs_enabled);
>
> void ppc_enable_pmcs(void)
> {
> + ppc_set_pmu_inuse(1);
> +
> /* Only need to enable them once */
> if (__get_cpu_var(pmcs_enabled))
> return;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
> index 8d75ea2..ca5f2e1 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
> @@ -223,10 +223,6 @@ static void pseries_lpar_enable_pmcs(void)
> set = 1UL << 63;
> reset = 0;
> plpar_hcall_norets(H_PERFMON, set, reset);
> -
> - /* instruct hypervisor to maintain PMCs */
> - if (firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_SPLPAR))
> - get_lppaca()->pmcregs_in_use = 1;
> }
>
> static void __init pseries_discover_pic(void)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-09 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-09 11:26 [PATCH] powerpc: Fix bug where perf_counters breaks oprofile Paul Mackerras
2009-09-09 13:31 ` Maynard Johnson [this message]
2009-09-14 20:14 ` Maynard Johnson
2009-09-14 20:43 ` Josh Boyer
2009-09-15 0:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-09-15 2:28 ` Josh Boyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AA7AE3B.30809@us.ibm.com \
--to=maynardj@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpjohn@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).