From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1E4EB7B80 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 06:32:31 +1100 (EST) Received: from de01smr01.freescale.net (de01smr01.freescale.net [10.208.0.31]) by az33egw02.freescale.net (8.14.3/az33egw02) with ESMTP id n9FJWSK3001054 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:32:29 -0700 (MST) Received: from az33exm25.fsl.freescale.net (az33exm25.am.freescale.net [10.64.32.16]) by de01smr01.freescale.net (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id n9FJZLOO027570 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:35:21 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4AD778E6.7020806@freescale.com> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:32:54 -0500 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christian Borntraeger Subject: Re: [PATCH] hvc_console: returning 0 from put_chars is not an error References: <1255557226-4403-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> <200910152041.26646.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <4AD770A9.6070509@freescale.com> <200910152126.28024.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <200910152126.28024.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Timur Tabi , Alan Cox , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Christian Borntraeger wrote: > About the backends, there are some that spin until the text is delivered (e.g. > virtio) , others can drop (e.g. iucv is a connection oriented protocol and it > will (and has to) drop if there is no connection). Sure, dropping due to not having a connection makes sense. That's different from merely being busy. Can the iucv code tell the difference between those two states? -Scott