From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e24smtp03.br.ibm.com (e24smtp03.br.ibm.com [32.104.18.24]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e24smtp03.br.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E5D8B7BCB for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:01:45 +1100 (EST) Received: from mailhub3.br.ibm.com (mailhub3.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.110]) by e24smtp03.br.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n9QGtUK7027425 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:55:30 -0200 Received: from d24av05.br.ibm.com (d24av05.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.44]) by mailhub3.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id n9QH2TY11388558 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:02:30 -0200 Received: from d24av05.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av05.br.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id n9QH1cl1003959 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:01:38 -0200 Received: from [9.8.5.147] ([9.8.5.147]) by d24av05.br.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id n9QH1btZ003927 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:01:37 -0200 Message-ID: <4AE5D5F0.9020805@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:01:36 -0200 From: Breno Leitao MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: INIT: PANIC: segmentation violation! sleeping for 30 seconds. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, I just put a upstream kernel(rc5) on a specific machine I have (Power5), and I got the following error: INIT: PANIC: segmentation violation! sleeping for 30 seconds. init has generated signal 11 but has no handler for it init used greatest stack depth: 6240 bytes left Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! Call Trace: [c0000001c6e7f920] [c000000000012588] .show_stack+0x6c/0x194 (unreliable) [c0000001c6e7f9d0] [c000000000088bd4] .panic+0x74/0x1c0 [c0000001c6e7fa60] [c00000000008cbdc] .do_exit+0x43c/0x82c [c0000001c6e7fb20] [c0000000000286f4] ._exception+0x1d4/0x204 [c0000001c6e7fcf0] [c0000000004e7dc8] .do_page_fault+0x4fc/0x634 [c0000001c6e7fe30] [c00000000000560c] handle_page_fault+0x20/0x74 Downgrading to rc2 shows the same result. Interesting enough, this is the only machine that fails with the upstream kernel. Have anyone seen anything similar ? Thanks