From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <4AF9CE2F.7080502@austin.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:33:51 -0600 From: Nathan Fontenot MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] of: merge prom_{add,remove,modify}_property References: <20091105073728.10460.6061.stgit@angua> <20091105074656.10460.29333.stgit@angua> In-Reply-To: <20091105074656.10460.29333.stgit@angua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, monstr@monstr.eu, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Grant Likely wrote: > Merge common code between PowerPC and MicroBlaze > > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely > --- > > arch/microblaze/kernel/prom.c | 113 ---------------------------------------- > arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c | 114 ---------------------------------------- > drivers/of/base.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 227 deletions(-) > Should the prom_{add,remove,update}_property routines belong in base.c or of_dynamic.c (patches coming soon for of_dynamic.c)? My original patch set put these routines in of_dynamic.c and renamed them to of_{add,remove,update}_property since they are part of the of code. -Nathan Fontenot