From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com (e7.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e7.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1296BB6F0C for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:16:20 +1100 (EST) Received: from d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (d01relay05.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.237]) by e7.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nAIKC8pC031281 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:12:08 -0500 Received: from d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (d03av06.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.245]) by d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id nAIKGGtW080940 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:16:17 -0500 Received: from d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id nAIKHl8A032238 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:17:47 -0700 Message-ID: <4B045603.5060801@austin.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:16:03 -0600 From: Nathan Fontenot MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Merge OF dynamic patches References: <4B030FC2.9070401@austin.ibm.com> <20091118104147.GD5166@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20091118104147.GD5166@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 03:04:02PM -0600, Nathan Fontenot wrote: >> This set of patches merges the common dynamic device tree >> updating routines of_attach_node() and of_detach_node() to >> drivers/of/of_dynamic.c. >> >> Built and tested on powerpc, I have no access to build/test >> this on microblaze. > > They look good, but I can't test them as they don't apply to test-devicetree. > On which commit are they based? I meant to base these on the test-devicetree branch but it appears that I did not checkout the test-devicetree branch after cloning. I will rebase the patches against the test-devicetree branch and re-send. > > It would be nice if you could also add a diffstat to every patch, this makes > reviewing 'move-around'-patches a bit easier. will do. -Nathan Fontenot