From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.10]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15B5B6F05 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:25:24 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <4B2B3C3D.4090308@grandegger.com> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:24:29 +0100 From: Wolfgang Grandegger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roman Fietze Subject: Re: MPC5200B XLB Configuration Issues, FEC RFIFO Events, ATA Crashes References: <200912091529.13913.roman.fietze@telemotive.de> <20091209145748.GB3112@pengutronix.de> <200912161237.09796.roman.fietze@telemotive.de> In-Reply-To: <200912161237.09796.roman.fietze@telemotive.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Roman Fietze wrote: > Hello Wolfram, > > On Wednesday 09 December 2009 15:57:48 Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> Do you have a way to measure performance penalties? > > As I said, I do. > > And here they are. They won't win a price for the most impartial > benchmarks ever seen, but thet'll be a good starting point to get a > feeling what stability might cost. > > The board is using the MPC5200B on a board derived from the old > lite5200, but with the fixes for the MPC5200B. All tests are run using > an ST940813AM hard drive with an ext2 and an ext3 of 10GB each, > default mkfs options. The OS is Debian 4.0. The network connection is > between a fast Athlon XP2 6400 and the target, using 100MBit/s wiring > and a 100MBit/s switch. > > The F always stands for fast settings, coherent cache, XLB features > like snooping, etc. turned on, XLB config 0x0000a006 or 0x0001a006 > (makes no or no big difference). > > The S always stands for slow settings, non coherent cache, XLB > features like snooping, etc. turned on, XLB config 0x80012006. What disc access modes, (pio, mwdma or udma) did you use for these tests. Wolfgang.