From: Bill Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.com>
To: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
Cc: Linux/PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Does gpio_to_irq() work for MPC52xx gpios?
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:39:08 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B327FEC.9030801@billgatliff.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B3249AA.50405@billgatliff.com>
Bill Gatliff wrote:
> Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>
>> No (not yet). In Ben's latest pull request there's a patch from me to
>> add basic infrastructure for gpio_to_irq(). I've recently added irq
>> support to the mpc8xxx driver, but so far nothing has been written for
>> 52xx.
>>
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/41550/
>>
>>
>
> Ok. I'm taking a look at that code now, planning to adapt it for the
> MPC52xx unless someone raises any objections.
>
Ok, working on this now. I'm pretty far along, but I'm stopped at what
I think is a device tree source file problem.
I have an external device that generates two interrupt outputs. One of
them is connected to IRQ2, the other to GPIO_WKUP_7. I'm describing the
device like this:
...
soc5200@f0000000 {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
compatible = "fsl,mpc5200b-immr","simple-bus";
ranges = <0 0xf0000000 0x0000c000>;
reg = <0xf0000000 0x00000100>;
bus-frequency = <0>; // from bootloader
system-frequency = <0>; // from bootloader
...
mpc5200_pic: interrupt-controller@500 {
// 5200 interrupts are encoded into two levels;
interrupt-controller;
gpio-controller;
#interrupt-cells = <3>;
#address-cells = <0>;
#size-cells = <0>;
compatible = "fsl,mpc5200b-pic","fsl,mpc5200-pic";
reg = <0x500 0x80>;
interrupts = < 0 0 3 1 1 3 2 2 2 3 3 2 >;
};
gpio_wkup: gpio@c00 {
compatible = "fsl,mpc5200b-gpio-wkup","fsl,mpc5200-gpio-wkup";
#gpio-cells = <2>;
#interrupt-cells = <2>;
#address-cells = <0>;
#size-cells = <0>;
reg = <0xc00 0x40>;
interrupts = <1 8 0 0 3 0>;
interrupt-parent = <&mpc5200_pic>;
gpio-controller;
interrupt-controller;
};
...
};
...
system {
compatible = "simple-bus";
rotary-encoder {
compatible = "linux,rotary-encoder","rotary-encoder";
interrupts = <&mpc5200_pic 2 3 &gpio_wkup 0 0>;
//interrupts = <&mpc5200_pic 2 3>;
//gpios = <&gpio_wkup 0 0>;
type = <1>;
val-ccw = <0x4a>;
val-cw = <78>;
};
};
When I use the "gpios" property instead of the above, I get a useful
gpio number and I can see the signal using sys/class/gpio. And I also
know the hardware is working because an ancient, pre-device-tree kernel
is working fine. :)
The problem is that I'm not getting a valid number out for the second
interrupt specification, presumably because the dts compiler doesn't
have any idea how to generate the data--- and I have no idea how to fix
that.
I captured some dmesg information which shows the problem. The first
line is for IRQ2, which is correct. The second is for GPIO_WKUP_7,
which the kernel chokes on:
...
irq: irq_create_mapping(0xcf814000,
0x42)
irq: -> using host
@cf814000
alloc irq_desc for 66 on node
0
alloc kstat_irqs on node
0
mpc52xx_irqhost_map: External IRQ2 virq=42, hw=42.
type=8
irq: irq 66 on host /soc5200@f0000000/interrupt-controller@500 mapped to
virtual irq
66
mpc52xx_extirq_set_type: irq=42. l2=2
flow_type=8
linux,rotary-encoder rotary-encoder.3: irq[0] 66 gpio[0] -2 <- my
driver's output, the "magic number" was 66
return 0, l1=4,
l2=0
irq: irq_create_mapping(0xcf814000,
0x0)
irq: -> using host
@cf814000
alloc irq_desc for 16 on node
0
alloc kstat_irqs on node
0
mpc52xx_irqhost_map: External IRQ0 virq=10, hw=0.
type=8
irq: irq 0 on host /soc5200@f0000000/interrupt-controller@500 mapped to
virtual irq
16
mpc52xx_extirq_set_type: irq=0. l2=0
flow_type=8
linux,rotary-encoder rotary-encoder.3: irq[1] 16 gpio[1] -2 <-
my driver's "magic number" was 16
...
The device tree has the magic number "66" for IRQ2, which
mpc52xx_irqhost_map gets right. But it doesn't know what to do with the
magic number "16" that's fed to it from the other interrupt
specification. And I don't yet, either... :)
Any ideas? Basically, what I think this boils down to is somewhere I
need to translate that 16 to yet another virtual number for the
demultiplexed interrupt descriptor. But I'm getting a little lost in
the virtual-ness of everything!
b.g.
--
Bill Gatliff
bgat@billgatliff.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-23 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-22 20:40 Does gpio_to_irq() work for MPC52xx gpios? Bill Gatliff
2009-12-22 21:00 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-12-23 16:47 ` Bill Gatliff
2009-12-23 20:39 ` Bill Gatliff [this message]
2009-12-24 5:38 ` Bill Gatliff
2009-12-24 6:52 ` Bill Gatliff
2009-12-30 6:27 ` Bill Gatliff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B327FEC.9030801@billgatliff.com \
--to=bgat@billgatliff.com \
--cc=jacmet@sunsite.dk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).