From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: nanda <nanda74pg@rediffmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, avorontsov@ru.mvista.com
Subject: Re: fsl upm NAND Flash issue without GPIO chip handler
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:39:07 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B574DCB.40304@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1263921085.S.3173.3591.f5mail-147-110.rediffmail.com.old.1264011068.46402@webmail.rediffmail.com>
nanda wrote:
> my response inlined..
>
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:41:25 +0530 wrote
> >nanda wrote:
> >
> > We had merged the 2.6.24
>
> That's pretty old...
> >> We were using 2.6.24 as this kernel version this is the references
> used by us for MPC8321E.
> > with the FSL based NAND driver,
>
> Which one? Which chip are you using, and how is NAND attached to it?
> >> MPC8321E processor connected to STM NAND Flash. Port C PIN 15 of the
> processor connected to the R/B# ( Ready/Busy PIN) of the STM NAND Flash.
And the other pins are connected to the local bus controller via UPM?
This is supported in the upstream kernel by drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c,
if there's nothing else keeping you on the BSP kernel.
> > we observed that gpio library is mandatory to be included. We have
> not included the
> > gpios configured in the dts file as the we don’t have the separate GPIO
> > chip(arch/powepc/boot/dts/board.dts).
>
> What separate GPIO chip? Which "board.dts" are you looking at?
> >> dts file I was refering is mpc832x_rdb.dts file, which we assumed
> that GPIO controller is not required. ( Correct me if my assumption is
> correct)
The only gpio controller in that dts file is the SoC's GPIO block (not a
separate "GPIO chip"). Specifically, it's port D; you'll want to add a
node for port C.
> > After executing the image in the board, we observed the below
> > 1) The device ID and manufacture Id was printed as "c0" and "c0" and the
> > error message "No NAND device found!!!". Does it mean it is not
> > accessing the NAND flash and the values read are junk one?
> > 2) Processor of the board doesn’t connect the Ready/Busy of the NAND
> > flash through the separate GPIO chip. I mean it is directly connected
> > from GPIO Port C of PIN 15 to the Ready/Busy PIN of the NAND flash.
> > Hence is it necessary to port the gpio specific functions like
> > gpio_request/gpio_free(specified in fsl_upm.c file), instead should we
> > need to configure the PIN par_io_config_pin() for configuration of the
> > PORT C with 15th PIN and set the data value using par_io_data_set()
> > (specified arch/powerpc/sysdev/qe_lib/qe_io.c)
>
> Have you tried pointing the "gpios" property at pin 15 of port C? The
> whole point of this abstraction is that these connections are described
> in the data, not in the code.
> >> Iam not sure how to specify the in the mpc832x_rdb.dts for the pin
> 15 port C of the MPc8321E processor.
It should look like port B/E in the 836x_rdk dts, except you want reg to
point at the port C registers.
For details, see the following binding documents:
Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/fsl/cpm_qe/qe/par_io.txt
Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/fsl/upm-nand.txt
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-20 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-20 18:11 Re: fsl upm NAND Flash issue without GPIO chip handler nanda
2010-01-20 18:39 ` Scott Wood [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-19 12:40 nanda
2010-01-19 17:13 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B574DCB.40304@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=nanda74pg@rediffmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).