From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e38.co.us.ibm.com (e38.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e38.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B43691007D7 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 04:51:09 +1100 (EST) Received: from d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.107]) by e38.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o0PHjisu008956 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:45:44 -0700 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o0PHojiH015262 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:50:45 -0700 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o0PHohmt010841 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:50:43 -0700 Message-ID: <4B5DD9F1.2010002@austin.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:50:41 -0600 From: Joel Schopp MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc: implement arch_scale_smt_power for Power7 References: <1264017638.5717.121.camel@jschopp-laptop> <1264017847.5717.132.camel@jschopp-laptop> <26556.1264021443@neuling.org> <4B577F1A.9060907@austin.ibm.com> <1264302028.3601.36.camel@pasglop> In-Reply-To: <1264302028.3601.36.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: Michael Neuling , Peter Zijlstra , ego@in.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 16:09 -0600, Joel Schopp wrote: > >> I can turn that into a conditional branch (case statement) with a shift >> for the common 1,2,4 cases which should cover all procs available today >> falling back to a divide for any theoretical future processors that do >> other numbers of threads. >> > > Look at the cputhreads.h implementation ... Today we only support > power-of-two numbers of threads. > I've run 3 threads using cpu hotplug to offline 1 of the 4. It's certainly a stupid idea, but there you go.