From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC95FDDF11 for ; Fri, 11 May 2007 00:27:24 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1AD7FFC7-8BEE-44C0-A28F-A36462C9B3EE@kernel.crashing.org> References: <11787390792190-git-send-email-becky.bruce@freescale.com> <20070510091138.6e4fe0e6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1AD7FFC7-8BEE-44C0-A28F-A36462C9B3EE@kernel.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <4B675D0C-B9D7-40CF-A43D-4EB4AA56167E@freescale.com> From: Becky Bruce Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move reg_booke.h to include/asm-powerpc Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 09:31:21 -0500 To: Kumar Gala Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On May 10, 2007, at 9:20 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On May 10, 2007, at 8:44 AM, Becky Bruce wrote: > >> >> On May 9, 2007, at 6:11 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 9 May 2007 14:31:19 -0500 Becky Bruce >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> This patch moves reg_booke.h from include/asm-ppc to include/asm- >>>> powerpc. This is >>>> just a git-mv of the file; no changes were made. Tested builds of >>>> 8540 ADS and >>>> Ebony platforms with ARCH=ppc and ARCH=powerpc. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce >>>> --- >>>> include/{asm-ppc => asm-powerpc}/reg_booke.h | 0 >>>> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>>> rename include/{asm-ppc => asm-powerpc}/reg_booke.h (100%) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/include/asm-ppc/reg_booke.h b/include/asm-powerpc/ >>>> reg_booke.h >>>> similarity index 100% >>>> rename from include/asm-ppc/reg_booke.h >>>> rename to include/asm-powerpc/reg_booke.h >>> >>> Could you please change the self inclusion protection defines? >> >> Certainement. I meant to send a second patch to do that, so the >> first one was *just* a move (who can resist the urge to put out a 0- >> line patch :). Will follow up. > > I already handled this and duplicated the file in my tree. Have you cleaned up any of the others? That was the other reason I was going to send a second patch - there are some tsi files, the unistd.h file, and a mpc82-something header that also use ASM_PPC - we might as well fix that, too. Cheers, B