From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-bw0-f218.google.com (mail-bw0-f218.google.com [209.85.218.218]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5720B7BEE for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 19:18:55 +1100 (EST) Received: by bwz10 with SMTP id 10so1227563bwz.2 for ; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 01:18:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BB456EC.2050408@mvista.com> Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:18:52 +0400 From: Maxim Uvarov MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christian Kujau Subject: Re: kexec for powerpc32 References: <20100331132300.GA15951@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: Maxim Uvarov , horms@verge.net.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Christian Kujau wrote: > On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 at 17:23, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > >> Kernel has all needed for kexec, but kexec-tools are broken for >> powerpc32. >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org/msg22498.html >> > > Oh :-\ > > >> I've just asked around, and it seems that Maxim (Cc'ed) will start >> working on reviving ppc32 support real soon. >> > > Well, in my case the powerpc32 machine is far from being a "production > system", but I'm glad to hear that he's working on it! > > Thanks for the response, > Christian. > Yes, the plan was to push upstream all MontaVista's powerpc kexec patches. But also some work here is required in understanding how far community code from our, port, cleanup and test patches. I hope that I will get to that task in this month. Best regards, Maxim Uvarov.