From: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
To: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jan-Bernd Themann <themann@de.ibm.com>,
dvhltc@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>,
niv@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Doug Maxey <doug.maxey@us.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Michael Ellerman <ellerman@au1.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT] ehea: make receive irq handler non-threaded (IRQF_NODELAY)
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 15:22:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BF31322.5090206@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BF30C32.1020403@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 05/18/2010 02:52 PM, Brian King wrote:
> Is IRQF_NODELAY something specific to the RT kernel? I don't see it in mainline...
Yes, it basically says "don't make this handler threaded".
--
Darren
>
> -Brian
>
>
> On 05/18/2010 04:33 PM, dvhltc@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
>> > From ad81664794e33d785f533c5edee37aaba20dd92d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Darren Hart<dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
>> Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 11:07:13 -0700
>> Subject: [PATCH RT] ehea: make receive irq handler non-threaded (IRQF_NODELAY)
>>
>> The underlying hardware is edge triggered but presented by XICS as level
>> triggered. The edge triggered interrupts are not reissued after masking. This
>> is not a problem in mainline which does not mask the interrupt (relying on the
>> EOI mechanism instead). The threaded interrupts in PREEMPT_RT do mask the
>> interrupt, and can lose interrupts that occurred while masked, resulting in a
>> hung ethernet interface.
>>
>> The receive handler simply calls napi_schedule(), as such, there is no
>> significant additional overhead in making this non-threaded, since we either
>> wakeup the threaded irq handler to call napi_schedule(), or just call
>> napi_schedule() directly to wakeup the softirqs. As the receive handler is
>> lockless, there is no need to convert any of the ehea spinlock_t's to
>> atomic_spinlock_t's.
>>
>> Without this patch, a simple scp file copy loop would fail quickly (usually
>> seconds). We have over two hours of sustained scp activity with the patch
>> applied.
>>
>> Credit goes to Will Schmidt for lots of instrumentation and tracing which
>> clarified the scenario and to Thomas Gleixner for the incredibly simple
>> solution.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart<dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
>> Acked-by: Will Schmidt<will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner<tglx@linuxtronix.de>
>> Cc: Jan-Bernd Themann<themann@de.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Nivedita Singhvi<niv@us.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Brian King<bjking1@us.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Michael Ellerman<ellerman@au1.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Doug Maxey<doug.maxey@us.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c b/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c
>> index 977c3d3..2c53df2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c
>> @@ -1263,7 +1263,7 @@ static int ehea_reg_interrupts(struct net_device *dev)
>> "%s-queue%d", dev->name, i);
>> ret = ibmebus_request_irq(pr->eq->attr.ist1,
>> ehea_recv_irq_handler,
>> - IRQF_DISABLED, pr->int_send_name,
>> + IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_NODELAY, pr->int_send_name,
>> pr);
>> if (ret) {
>> ehea_error("failed registering irq for ehea_queue "
>
>
--
Darren Hart
IBM Linux Technology Center
Real-Time Linux Team
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-18 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4BF30793.5070300@us.ibm.com>
2010-05-18 21:52 ` [PATCH RT] ehea: make receive irq handler non-threaded (IRQF_NODELAY) Brian King
2010-05-18 22:19 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2010-05-18 22:22 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2010-05-19 1:25 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-05-19 14:16 ` Darren Hart
2010-05-19 14:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-05-19 21:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-05-20 1:34 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-05-20 7:37 ` Jan-Bernd Themann
2010-05-20 8:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-05-20 9:05 ` Jan-Bernd Themann
2010-05-20 9:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-05-20 14:26 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2010-05-20 14:53 ` Will Schmidt
2010-05-20 14:39 ` Darren Hart
2010-05-20 14:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-05-20 21:44 ` Will Schmidt
2010-05-20 1:32 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-05-20 8:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-05-21 9:18 ` [PATCH RT] ehea: make receive irq handler non-threaded (IRQF_NODELAY), " Milton Miller
2010-09-20 14:26 ` Jan-Bernd Themann
2010-05-20 1:28 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-05-21 9:02 ` Milton Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BF31322.5090206@us.ibm.com \
--to=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=doug.maxey@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhltc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ellerman@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=niv@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=themann@de.ibm.com \
--cc=will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).