From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from edu-smtp-02.edutel.nl (edu-smtp-02.edutel.nl [88.159.1.176]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C571007D3 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:27:14 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4C189860.3040702@neli.hopto.org> Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:24:48 +0200 From: Micha Nelissen MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aggrwal Poonam-B10812 , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] e500v2 36 bit large physical HID0[EN_MAS7_UPDATE] References: <4C187616.4000303@neli.hopto.org> <8660DA277DC57B4BAAC78225F03146B6AB1B5C@zin33exm24.fsl.freescale.net> In-Reply-To: <8660DA277DC57B4BAAC78225F03146B6AB1B5C@zin33exm24.fsl.freescale.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Aggrwal Poonam-B10812 wrote: >> Attached is a patch to fix large physical address support for the > > This is already being done by u-boot, should linux set it again? Yikes! Took me 5 min to reformat your email. Our version of U-boot does not but it's not latest greatest. IMHO: 1) Linux should not be dependent on U-boot or any other bootloader, or at least as possible 2) U-boot cannot (and does not want to) know whether Linux is going to use large physical addresses. Regards, Micha