From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from edu-smtp-01.edutel.nl (edu-smtp-01.edutel.nl [88.159.1.175]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77F11007D4 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:55:20 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4C18E545.30807@neli.hopto.org> Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:52:53 +0200 From: Micha Nelissen MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Timur Tabi , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] e500v2 36 bit large physical HID0[EN_MAS7_UPDATE] References: <4C187616.4000303@neli.hopto.org> <8660DA277DC57B4BAAC78225F03146B6AB1B5C@zin33exm24.fsl.freescale.net> <4C189860.3040702@neli.hopto.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Timur Tabi wrote: > I'm sorry, but Linux does depend on the boot loader, and U-Boot does > need to know whether Linux is going to use 36-bit addressing. Why? > That's > just the way it works. What a great design philosophy! > Linux patches that repeat what U-Boot already > does just so that you don't need to update your U-boot are going to be > rejected. Who said anything about not wanting/needing to upgrade U-boot? Micha