From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C0AB6EF0 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:05:18 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4C29EF8A.4070508@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:05:14 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Graf Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions References: <1277507817-626-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <1277507817-626-2-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <4C285D1C.5060508@redhat.com> <20417D40-9345-485B-9201-8B3722B7457F@suse.de> <4C286770.6010204@redhat.com> <4C29ED94.6060904@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <4C29ED94.6060904@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev , KVM list , kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 06/29/2010 03:56 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: > >> On 06/28/2010 11:55 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >>> >>>>> + >>>>> +static inline u64 kvmppc_mmu_hash_pte(u64 eaddr) { >>>>> + return hash_64(eaddr>> PTE_SIZE, HPTEG_HASH_BITS_PTE); >>>>> +} >>>>> + >>>>> +static inline u64 kvmppc_mmu_hash_vpte(u64 vpage) { >>>>> + return hash_64(vpage& 0xfffffffffULL, HPTEG_HASH_BITS_VPTE); >>>>> +} >>>>> + >>>>> +static inline u64 kvmppc_mmu_hash_vpte_long(u64 vpage) { >>>>> + return hash_64((vpage& 0xffffff000ULL)>> 12, >>>>> + HPTEG_HASH_BITS_VPTE_LONG); >>>>> +} >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Still with the wierd coding style? >>>> >>>> >>> Not sure what's going on there. My editor displays it normally. Weird. >>> >>> >> Try hitting 'save'. >> > hexdump -C on the respective section in the exact patch file I submitted > above shows: > > 00000a80 75 72 6e 20 68 61 73 68 5f 36 34 28 65 61 64 64 |urn > hash_64(eadd| > 00000a90 72 20 3e 3e 20 50 54 45 5f 53 49 5a 45 2c 20 48 |r>> > PTE_SIZE, H| > > > Maybe your mail client breaks it? > The list archives too: http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg37093.html Looks like a cache coherency bug. What processor are you using? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function