From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82BDFB6F10 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:13:28 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4C29F174.9020902@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:13:24 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Graf Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions References: <1277507817-626-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <1277507817-626-2-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <4C285D1C.5060508@redhat.com> <20417D40-9345-485B-9201-8B3722B7457F@suse.de> <4C286770.6010204@redhat.com> <4C29ED94.6060904@suse.de> <4C29EF8A.4070508@redhat.com> <4C29EFCC.3030303@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <4C29EFCC.3030303@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev , KVM list , kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 06/29/2010 04:06 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > > Are we looking at the same link? Looks good to me there. > > We're probably looking at the same link but looking at different things. I'm whining about static u64 f() { ... } as opposed to the more sober static u64 f() { ... } for f in [kvmppc_mmu_hash_pte, kvmppc_mmu_hash_vpte, kvmppc_mmu_hash_vpte_long]. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function