From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5AFF1007D4 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 18:05:15 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4C5A70B6.90307@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:05:10 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Graf Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/27] KVM PPC PV framework v3 References: <1280407688-9815-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <4C557E7A.3010606@redhat.com> <20100803111611.38ca87e6@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> <4C5A6F01.6050705@redhat.com> <55AD06CD-842E-49DC-97CD-AEE401F5B8C5@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <55AD06CD-842E-49DC-97CD-AEE401F5B8C5@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: Scott Wood , linuxppc-dev , kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, KVM list , Hollis Blanchard List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 08/05/2010 11:01 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > >> Shall I take this as an ACK? > Hollis wanted to take a look at it too. But given the fact that I have another ~10 patches lying here I'd appreciate if things could get committed. If changes are so dramatic that they'd render things incompatible, we can always just release both patches for an actual kernel release, right? That's true, we have some time to get it right. Hollis, please let us know either way once you've reviewed things. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function