From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: "tmarri@apm.com" <tmarri@apm.com>
Cc: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
"herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au" <herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
"yur@emcraft.com" <yur@emcraft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] PPC4xx: New file with SoC specific functions
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 15:48:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C9BD94B.8030203@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1285279906-16819-1-git-send-email-tmarri@apm.com>
On 9/23/2010 3:11 PM, tmarri@apm.com wrote:
> From: Tirumala Marri<tmarri@apm.com>
>
> This patch creates new file with SoC dependent functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tirumala R Marri<tmarri@apm.com>
> ---
> V1:
> * Remove all 440SPe specific references.
Maybe it renames ppc440spe to ppc4xx but it adds things like...
> +#if defined(CONFIG_440SPe) || defined(CONFIG_440SP)
> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "ibm,i2o-440spe");
> +#endif
...in the code. Which is 1) not generic and 2) I suspect causes a
compile warning for using an uninitialized variable.
> + if (!np) {
> + pr_err("%s: can't find I2O device tree node\n",
> + __func__);
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto err_req2;
> + }
It looks to me like the common code will need to have a few build
dependent helper routines as it appears one instance of the driver
cannot simultaneously support 440sp, 440spe, and 460ex.
--
Dan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-23 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-23 22:11 [PATCH v1 3/4] PPC4xx: New file with SoC specific functions tmarri
2010-09-23 22:48 ` Dan Williams [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C9BD94B.8030203@intel.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=tmarri@apm.com \
--cc=yur@emcraft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).