From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] v2 De-Couple sysfs memory directories from memory sections
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:44:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CA1E338.6070201@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CA0EBEB.1030204@austin.ibm.com>
On 09/27/2010 09:09 PM, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> This set of patches decouples the concept that a single memory
> section corresponds to a single directory in
> /sys/devices/system/memory/. On systems
> with large amounts of memory (1+ TB) there are perfomance issues
> related to creating the large number of sysfs directories. For
> a powerpc machine with 1 TB of memory we are creating 63,000+
> directories. This is resulting in boot times of around 45-50
> minutes for systems with 1 TB of memory and 8 hours for systems
> with 2 TB of memory. With this patch set applied I am now seeing
> boot times of 5 minutes or less.
>
> The root of this issue is in sysfs directory creation. Every time
> a directory is created a string compare is done against all sibling
> directories to ensure we do not create duplicates. The list of
> directory nodes in sysfs is kept as an unsorted list which results
> in this being an exponentially longer operation as the number of
> directories are created.
>
> The solution solved by this patch set is to allow a single
> directory in sysfs to span multiple memory sections. This is
> controlled by an optional architecturally defined function
> memory_block_size_bytes(). The default definition of this
> routine returns a memory block size equal to the memory section
> size. This maintains the current layout of sysfs memory
> directories as it appears to userspace to remain the same as it
> is today.
>
Why not update sysfs directory creation to be fast, for example by using
an rbtree instead of a linked list. This fixes an implementation
problem in the kernel instead of working around it and creating a new ABI.
New ABIs mean old tools won't work, and new tools need to understand
both ABIs.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-28 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-27 19:09 [PATCH 0/8] v2 De-Couple sysfs memory directories from memory sections Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-27 19:21 ` [PATCH 1/8] v2 Move find_memory_block() routine Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-27 19:22 ` [PATCH 2/8] v2 Add section count to memory_block struct Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-28 9:31 ` Robin Holt
2010-09-28 18:14 ` Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-27 19:23 ` [PATCH 3/8] v2 Add mutex for adding/removing memory blocks Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-27 19:25 ` [PATCH 4/8] v2 Allow memory block to span multiple memory sections Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-27 23:55 ` Dave Hansen
2010-09-28 18:06 ` Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-28 12:48 ` Robin Holt
2010-09-28 18:20 ` Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-27 19:26 ` [PATCH 5/8] v2 Add end_phys_index file Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-27 19:27 ` [PATCH 6/8] v2 Update node sysfs code Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-28 9:29 ` Robin Holt
2010-09-28 15:21 ` Dave Hansen
2010-09-27 19:28 ` [PATCH 7/8] v2 Define memory_block_size_bytes() for powerpc/pseries Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-27 19:28 ` [PATCH 8/8] v2 Update memory hotplug documentation Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-28 12:45 ` Avi Kivity
2010-09-28 18:18 ` Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-28 12:38 ` [PATCH 0/8] v2 De-Couple sysfs memory directories from memory sections Robin Holt
2010-09-28 18:17 ` Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-29 19:28 ` Robin Holt
2010-09-30 15:17 ` Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-30 16:39 ` Robin Holt
2010-09-28 12:44 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-09-28 15:12 ` Robin Holt
2010-09-28 16:34 ` Avi Kivity
2010-09-29 2:50 ` Greg KH
2010-09-29 8:32 ` Avi Kivity
2010-09-29 12:37 ` Greg KH
2010-09-29 13:39 ` Kay Sievers
2010-10-03 7:52 ` Avi Kivity
2010-09-28 15:17 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CA1E338.6070201@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=nfont@austin.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).