From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, kumar.gala@freescale.com,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT support to PowerPC Book-E watchdog driver
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 12:22:30 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CF93566.1050601@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101203180751.GA1903@zod.rchland.ibm.com>
Josh Boyer wrote:
> I'm confused why you can't use booke_wdt_enabled for the purposes of the
> device having been opened. It seems the use of the wdt_is_active
> basically duplicates this functionalit (and oddly with the bit
> manipulation instead of just atomic_inc/dec).
Because the watchdog can be enabled even when the driver is not open.
booke_wdt_enabled is also initialized in setup_32.c. So booke_wdt_enabled
represents the watchdog hardwre, whereas wdt_is_active represents the open
condition of /dev/watchdog.
However, now that I think about it, maybe that just causes confusion. If the
watchdog is already running because of a command-line parameter, should we
prevent /dev/watchdog from ever being opened? If you're okay with that, then I
can combine the two variables.
> If you were to keep this variable instead of just using
> booke_wdt_enabled, wouldn't it be more correct to have the clear_bit
> only done inside the #ifndef? The timer is very much still active if
> NOWAYOUT is set...
In this case, yes.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-03 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-03 16:51 [PATCH] watchdog: add CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT support to PowerPC Book-E watchdog driver Timur Tabi
2010-12-03 18:07 ` Josh Boyer
2010-12-03 18:22 ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2010-12-03 19:05 ` Josh Boyer
2010-12-03 19:10 ` Timur Tabi
2010-12-03 19:39 ` Josh Boyer
2010-12-03 19:43 ` Timur Tabi
2010-12-03 19:50 ` Josh Boyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CF93566.1050601@freescale.com \
--to=timur@freescale.com \
--cc=jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kumar.gala@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).