From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3241BDE01A for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:51:10 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <18190.42074.495464.74585@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <18190.5965.836544.396721@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <3A203D25-2CC1-4450-ADA1-752A99504108@kernel.crashing.org> <18190.42074.495464.74585@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <4D0E51C1-6B26-4166-AB89-DF9748A6BA97@kernel.crashing.org> From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: powerpc commits for 2.6.24 Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:51:33 -0500 To: Paul Mackerras Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Oct 11, 2007, at 5:31 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Kumar Gala writes: > >> I'm debugging one issue with MPC8560 that should get fixed today with >> a new pull request after I find the issue. > > There's no particular hurry for bug fixes. Already dealt with, mainly I was being stupid. >> Just to clarify, are we closing 2.6.24 for new code after you send >> Linus a pull request or are we still taking things during the two >> week merge window? > > Basically, yes. We got a lecture at kernel summit from Linus and > Andrew where we got told to get everything merged early in the merge > window. I might make an exception for stuff that has already been > posted for review but still needs some minor changes, but other than > that, the window for new code has closed. I was wondering about this case. I'll follow your lead here. - k