From: Felix Radensky <felix@embedded-sol.com>
To: "Ira W. Snyder" <iws@ovro.caltech.edu>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] fsldma: lockup fixes
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 07:52:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D6C89A7.8010803@embedded-sol.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110301002156.GC31428@ovro.caltech.edu>
Hi Ira,
On 03/01/2011 02:21 AM, Ira W. Snyder wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:27:40PM +0200, Felix Radensky wrote:
>> Hi Ira,
>>
>> On 02/28/2011 11:11 PM, Ira W. Snyder wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:15:49PM +0200, Felix Radensky wrote:
>>>> Hi Ira,
>>>>
>>>>> Thank you very much Felix. The dmesg output shows that the controller
>>>>> never got an interrupt for the second transaction. The patch below has
>>>>> extra debugging information that may help determine why this happens.
>>>>> Please apply it and re-run the test.
>>>>>
>>>>> The last section of dmesg (after "Freeing unused kernel memory") is all
>>>>> I need.
>>>>>
>>>> Attached relevant dmesg portion.
>>>>
>>> Ok, try this patch on top of the last one.
>>>
>>> It looks like you used the dmatest module in multi-channel mode last
>>> time. One channel makes it easier to debug:
>>>
>>> modprobe dmatest max_channels=1 threads_per_chan=2 iterations=1
>>>
>>> Thanks for your help in debugging this. Hopefully this is the last
>>> patch to test. :)
>>>
>>> Ira
>>>
>> Looks like this was not the last one. The test still fails, see below
>>
> From this log, it looks like the DMA controller is not generating an
> interrupt after the second chain is started. The first chain is finished
> before the second thread runs and starts its chain.
>
> The end-of-segments interrupt is completely missing. The part is not
> behaving as the datasheet explains it should. Are you sure you applied
> the patch and rebuilt the kernel? (Just checking to be sure. I'm very
> appreciative of the amount of help you've given me debugging this!)
>
> Can you run this for me:
>
> modprobe dmatest max_channels=1 threads_per_chan=1 iterations=4
>
> Thanks again,
> Ira
Without your patches applied the output of the test above looks
like this:
__dma_request_channel: success (dma0chan0)
dmatest: Started 1 threads using dma0chan0
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: irq: channel 0, stat = 0xa
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: irq: End-of-segments INT
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: irq: clndar 0x2f34d000, nlndar 0x100000000
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: irq: End-of-link INT
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: no pending LDs
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: irq: Exit
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: chan completed_cookie = 1
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: LD ef34d000 callback
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: chan completed_cookie = 1
dma0chan0-copy0: verifying source buffer...
dma0chan0-copy0: verifying dest buffer...
dma0chan0-copy0: #0: No errors with src_off=0xb90 dst_off=0x101c
len=0x2aea
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: irq: channel 0, stat = 0xa
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: irq: End-of-segments INT
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: irq: clndar 0x2f34d000, nlndar 0x100000000
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: irq: End-of-link INT
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: no pending LDs
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: irq: Exit
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: chan completed_cookie = 2
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: LD ef34d000 callback
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: chan completed_cookie = 2
dma0chan0-copy0: verifying source buffer...
dma0chan0-copy0: verifying dest buffer...
dma0chan0-copy0: #1: No errors with src_off=0x74a dst_off=0x54d len=0x35f5
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: irq: channel 0, stat = 0xa
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: irq: End-of-segments INT
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: irq: clndar 0x2f34d000, nlndar 0x100000000
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: irq: End-of-link INT
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: no pending LDs
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: irq: Exit
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: chan completed_cookie = 3
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: LD ef34d000 callback
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: chan completed_cookie = 3
dma0chan0-copy0: verifying source buffer...
dma0chan0-copy0: verifying dest buffer...
dma0chan0-copy0: #2: No errors with src_off=0x2ad dst_off=0x557 len=0x35e1
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: irq: channel 0, stat = 0xa
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: irq: End-of-segments INT
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: irq: clndar 0x2f34d000, nlndar 0x100000000
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: irq: End-of-link INT
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: no pending LDs
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: irq: Exit
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: chan completed_cookie = 4
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: LD ef34d000 callback
of:fsl-elo-dma ffe0c300.dma: chan completed_cookie = 4
dma0chan0-copy0: verifying source buffer...
dma0chan0-copy0: verifying dest buffer...
dma0chan0-copy0: #3: No errors with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x4000
dma0chan0-copy0: terminating after 4 tests, 0 failures (status 0)
Felix.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-01 5:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-28 18:47 [PATCH 0/8] fsldma: lockup fixes Felix Radensky
2011-02-28 19:53 ` Ira W. Snyder
2011-02-28 20:15 ` Felix Radensky
2011-02-28 21:11 ` Ira W. Snyder
2011-02-28 21:27 ` Felix Radensky
2011-03-01 0:21 ` Ira W. Snyder
2011-03-01 5:46 ` Felix Radensky
2011-03-01 5:52 ` Felix Radensky [this message]
2011-03-01 16:55 ` Ira W. Snyder
2011-03-01 19:52 ` Ira W. Snyder
2011-03-02 5:49 ` Felix Radensky
2011-03-02 16:42 ` Ira W. Snyder
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-02-28 11:36 Felix Radensky
2011-02-28 17:16 ` Ira W. Snyder
2011-02-26 0:23 Ira W. Snyder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D6C89A7.8010803@embedded-sol.com \
--to=felix@embedded-sol.com \
--cc=iws@ovro.caltech.edu \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).