From: Andre Schwarz <andre.schwarz@matrix-vision.de>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: LinuxPPC List <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: How to define an I2C-to-SPI bridge device ?
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:28:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D8C603F.6060501@matrix-vision.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c843f864-2a5a-4146-bd95-13c2fb91f430@email.android.com>
Grant, Anton,
>>> we're about to get new MPC8377 based hardware with various peripherals.
>>>> There are two I2C-to-SPI bridge devices (NXP SC18IS602) and I'm not sure
>>>> how to define a proper dts...
>>>>
>>>> Of course it's an easy thing creating 2 child nodes on the CPU's I2C
>>>> device - but how can I represent the created SPI bus ?
>>> Um.. the same as the other SPI buses? I.e.
>>>
>>> i2c-controller { /* SOC I2C controller */
>>> spi-controller { /* The I2C-to-SPI bridge */
>>> spi-device@0 {
>>> };
>>> spi-device@1 {
>>> };
>>> };
>>> };
>>>
>> ok , thanks - looks straight forward.
>> Is this any more than plain definition, i.e. will this trigger any I2C
>> or SPI device registration/linking ?
>>>> Is the (possibly) required driver (of_sc18is60x_spi ?) supposed to be an
>>>> I2C slave or an SPI host driver ?
>>> It should be an I2C driver that registers an SPI master (i.e.
>>> calls spi_alloc_master() and spi_register_master()).
>> hmm - ok. Will have to do it manually then ...
> Yes, but this is the case for non-of drivers too. The i2c to spi device driver must always create (and trigger population of) the spi bus instance.
>
I've kicked that I2C-to-SPI stuff completely because it's been too slow.
We've connected the SPI busses to the FPGA controlling almost everything
now.
Unfortunately there are some questions left :
Following Anton's suggestion I've had a look at /drivers/mfd (sm501.c)
and implemented a pci driver for the FPGA using
subdevices for additional functionality it exports - besides others we
now have 2 SPI masters.
For both SPI masters I have created and registered a platform_device.
pdev->dev is then fed into spi_alloc_master() and the resulting master
goes into spi_register_master().
master->bus_num is set to 0 and 1, i.e. no dynamic numbering.
master->chipselect = 8;
Since I can probe the SPI device using FPGA intrinsic information I
decided to register the client
devices on runtime using a "struct spi_board_info" which is fed into
spi_new_device().
The current design has 2 clients on SPI-0 and 5 clients on SPI-1.
static struct spi_board_info mergerbox_spi_boardinfo[] = {
{ .bus_num = 0,
.chip_select = 0,
.max_speed_hz = 4<<20, },
{ .bus_num = 0,
.chip_select = 1,
.max_speed_hz = 4<<20, },
{ .bus_num = 1,
.chip_select = 0,
.max_speed_hz = 4<<20, },
.....
After loading my module I get :
#> ls /sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.0/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.0/modalias
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.0/spi0.0/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.0/spi0.1/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.0/spi_master/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.0/subsystem/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.0/uevent
#> ls /sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.1/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.1/modalias
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.1/spi1.0/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.1/spi1.1/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.1/spi1.2/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.1/spi1.3/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.1/spi1.4/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.1/spi_master/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.1/subsystem/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.1/uevent
What I'm missing are the /dev/spi* entries.
There's also a spi_mpc8xxx driver using the CPU's SPI controller.
It is configured by dts (2 devices) and uses dynamic bus numbering:
#> ls /sys/bus/spi/devices/
spi0.0 spi1.0 spi1.2 spi1.4 spi32766.1
spi0.1 spi1.1 spi1.3 spi32766.0
This devices are processed by spidev and proper entries are created
ready for use :
#> ls /dev/spi*
/dev/spidev32766.0 /dev/spidev32766.1
Am I missing somehting obvious ?
Since there's no driver registration we don't have a probe function - is
this a problem regarding device binding ?
Do I need to use the .modalias in "struct spi_board_info" ?
Any help is welcome.
Regards,
André
MATRIX VISION GmbH, Talstrasse 16, DE-71570 Oppenweiler
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 271090
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Gerhard Thullner, Werner Armingeon, Uwe Furtner
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-25 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-03 8:36 How to define an I2C-to-SPI bridge device ? André Schwarz
2010-09-03 12:08 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-09-06 11:40 ` Andre Schwarz
2010-09-06 14:37 ` André Schwarz
2010-09-09 18:23 ` Grant Likely
2010-09-10 8:11 ` André Schwarz
2010-09-10 17:37 ` Grant Likely
2010-09-10 18:14 ` André Schwarz
2010-09-10 18:27 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-09-10 18:28 ` Grant Likely
2010-09-12 15:10 ` André Schwarz
2010-09-13 4:39 ` Grant Likely
2011-03-25 9:28 ` Andre Schwarz [this message]
2011-03-29 16:21 ` Andre Schwarz
2011-03-31 3:43 ` Grant Likely
2010-09-09 17:06 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D8C603F.6060501@matrix-vision.de \
--to=andre.schwarz@matrix-vision.de \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).