linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Schwarz <andre.schwarz@matrix-vision.de>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: LinuxPPC List <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: How to define an I2C-to-SPI bridge device ?
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:28:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D8C603F.6060501@matrix-vision.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c843f864-2a5a-4146-bd95-13c2fb91f430@email.android.com>

Grant, Anton,

>>> we're about to get new MPC8377 based hardware with various peripherals.
>>>> There are two I2C-to-SPI bridge devices (NXP SC18IS602) and I'm not sure
>>>> how to define a proper dts...
>>>>
>>>> Of course it's an easy thing creating 2 child nodes on the CPU's I2C
>>>> device - but how can I represent the created SPI bus ?
>>> Um.. the same as the other SPI buses? I.e.
>>>
>>> i2c-controller {  /* SOC I2C controller */
>>> 	spi-controller {  /* The I2C-to-SPI bridge */
>>> 		spi-device@0 {
>>> 		};
>>> 		spi-device@1 {
>>> 		};
>>> 	};
>>> };
>>>
>> ok , thanks - looks straight forward.
>> Is this any more than plain definition, i.e. will this trigger any I2C
>> or SPI device registration/linking ?
>>>> Is the (possibly) required driver (of_sc18is60x_spi ?) supposed to be an
>>>> I2C slave or an SPI host driver ?
>>> It should be an I2C driver that registers an SPI master (i.e.
>>> calls spi_alloc_master() and spi_register_master()).
>> hmm - ok. Will have to do it manually then ...
> Yes, but this is the case for non-of drivers too.  The i2c to spi device driver must always create (and trigger population of) the spi bus instance.
>

I've kicked that I2C-to-SPI stuff completely because it's been too slow.
We've connected the SPI busses to the FPGA controlling almost everything 
now.

Unfortunately there are some questions left :

Following Anton's suggestion I've had a look at /drivers/mfd (sm501.c) 
and implemented a pci driver for the FPGA using
subdevices for additional functionality it exports - besides others we 
now have 2 SPI masters.

For both SPI masters I have created and registered a platform_device.
pdev->dev is then fed into spi_alloc_master() and the resulting master 
goes into spi_register_master().

master->bus_num is set to 0 and 1, i.e. no dynamic numbering.
master->chipselect = 8;

Since I can probe the SPI device using FPGA intrinsic information I 
decided to register the client
devices on runtime using a "struct spi_board_info" which is fed into 
spi_new_device().

The current design has 2 clients on SPI-0 and 5 clients on SPI-1.

static struct spi_board_info mergerbox_spi_boardinfo[] = {
         {       .bus_num = 0,
                 .chip_select = 0,
                 .max_speed_hz = 4<<20, },
         {       .bus_num = 0,
                 .chip_select = 1,
                 .max_speed_hz = 4<<20, },
         {       .bus_num = 1,
                 .chip_select = 0,
                 .max_speed_hz = 4<<20, },
.....


After loading my module I get :

#> ls /sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.0/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.0/modalias
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.0/spi0.0/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.0/spi0.1/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.0/spi_master/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.0/subsystem/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.0/uevent

#> ls /sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.1/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.1/modalias
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.1/spi1.0/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.1/spi1.1/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.1/spi1.2/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.1/spi1.3/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.1/spi1.4/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.1/spi_master/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.1/subsystem/
/sys/devices/platform/AlteraSPI.1/uevent

What I'm missing are the /dev/spi* entries.

There's also a spi_mpc8xxx driver using the CPU's SPI controller.
It is configured by dts (2 devices) and uses dynamic bus numbering:

#> ls /sys/bus/spi/devices/
spi0.0      spi1.0      spi1.2      spi1.4      spi32766.1
spi0.1      spi1.1      spi1.3      spi32766.0

This devices are processed by spidev and proper entries are created 
ready for use :

#> ls /dev/spi*
/dev/spidev32766.0  /dev/spidev32766.1


Am I missing somehting obvious ?

Since there's no driver registration we don't have a probe function - is 
this a problem regarding device binding ?

Do I need to use the .modalias in "struct spi_board_info" ?


Any help is welcome.

Regards,
André

MATRIX VISION GmbH, Talstrasse 16, DE-71570 Oppenweiler
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 271090
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Gerhard Thullner, Werner Armingeon, Uwe Furtner

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-03-25  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-03  8:36 How to define an I2C-to-SPI bridge device ? André Schwarz
2010-09-03 12:08 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-09-06 11:40   ` Andre Schwarz
2010-09-06 14:37     ` André Schwarz
2010-09-09 18:23     ` Grant Likely
2010-09-10  8:11       ` André Schwarz
2010-09-10 17:37         ` Grant Likely
2010-09-10 18:14           ` André Schwarz
2010-09-10 18:27             ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-09-10 18:28             ` Grant Likely
2010-09-12 15:10               ` André Schwarz
2010-09-13  4:39                 ` Grant Likely
2011-03-25  9:28       ` Andre Schwarz [this message]
2011-03-29 16:21         ` Andre Schwarz
2011-03-31  3:43           ` Grant Likely
2010-09-09 17:06 ` Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D8C603F.6060501@matrix-vision.de \
    --to=andre.schwarz@matrix-vision.de \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).