From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EB612C0088 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 00:47:22 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/85xx: Create dts of each core in CAMP mode for P1021RDB-PC Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Kumar Gala In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:47:17 -0500 Message-Id: <4D91E39B-2773-429D-B956-38C04521C8B2@kernel.crashing.org> References: <1341909561-6591-1-git-send-email-Jiucheng.Xu@freescale.com> <1341909561-6591-2-git-send-email-Jiucheng.Xu@freescale.com> To: Tabi Timur-B04825 Cc: McClintock Matthew-B29882 , Xu Jiucheng-B37781 , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Jul 10, 2012, at 7:25 AM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Xu Jiucheng = wrote: >> Create the dts files for each core and splits the devices between >> the two cores for P1021RDB-PC. >>=20 >> Core0 has l2, serial0, i2c, spi, gpio, tdm,dma, usb, eth0, eth1, >> sdhc, crypto, global-util, message, pci0, pci1, msi, crypto. >> Core1 has l2, serial1, eth2. >>=20 >> Signed-off-by: Xu Jiucheng >> Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock >> --- >=20 > Do we really want AMP device trees upstream? They're very > application-specific, and AMP support has always been a hack. If > anything, I think we should be deleting AMP device trees from > upstream, not adding more. Since we already have P1021RDB-PC w/AMP support in upstream I agree we = don't need another example on P1021RDB-PC. - k=