From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <4DBAE461.7000307@linutronix.de> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:16:33 +0200 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] General device tree irq domain infrastructure References: <20110428192227.8979.49181.stgit@ponder> In-Reply-To: <20110428192227.8979.49181.stgit@ponder> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: Michal Simek , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle , hpa@zytor.com, Dirk Brandewie , Thomas Gleixner , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Grant Likely wrote: > I'd really like to get patches 1-4 merged into 2.6.40. Please test. > I'm also running through build testing here, and when it's complete > I'll push it out to a 'devicetree/irq-domain' branch on > git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6 I pulled this, built and booted my x86-dt box and nothing exploded so far. If you merge Linus' tree then you will get a conflict (sooner or later) in ioapic_of_irq_map() in arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c: - return io_apic_setup_irq_pin_once(*out_hwirq, cpu_to_node(0), &attr); - if (io_apic_setup_irq_pin(hwirq, cpu_to_node(0), &attr)) ++ if (io_apic_setup_irq_pin_once(hwirq, cpu_to_node(0), &attr)) Sebastian