From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin+linuxppc@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Mapping an executable page
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:02:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DF7BE43.1010407@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimhKOvY8XA=_20rjtkZ0Um45o2Bow@mail.gmail.com>
Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> * However, if you jump to an address in that page, you'll have to make
> sure that the entire code that executes is mapped (make map_size large
> enough).
Well, that seems obvious.
> * When that range spanned multiple pages, I faced the issue of only
> one page being actually mapped in the TLBs. My assumption is that the
> call to __ioremap not necessarily updates the TLBs, but mainly some
> kernel-internal tables. The actual TLB mapping presumably happens when
> a data exception occurs.
Hmmm.... I find that surprising. Memory allocated via ioremap() is supposed to
be available in interrupt handlers, where TLB mappings can't be created
on-the-fly. I'm not sure that your observation is correct.
> * Therefore, to make sure that the mapping I intended with __ioremap()
> is actually reflected in the TLB tables, I added dummy reads of each
> page in the TLB, prior to jumping to the boot code, as follows:
> /* make sure memory is read, once every 4Kbyte is enough */
> for (p = vaddr; p < vaddr + map_size; p += 0x1000) {
You should at least use PAGE_SIZE instead of 0x1000.
> unsigned long dummy = *(volatile unsigned long *)p;
> (void)dummy;
> }
>
> * After these changes (make sure all code is mapped + make sure to
> read all pages so that the TLBs are updated), my scenario works fine.
I still find it hard to believe that this is necessary.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-14 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-27 13:25 Mapping an executable page Thomas De Schampheleire
2011-05-29 14:53 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2011-06-14 8:56 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2011-06-14 20:02 ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2011-06-14 20:07 ` Timur Tabi
2011-06-22 7:49 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2011-06-22 11:40 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2011-06-22 12:53 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2011-06-22 7:44 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2011-06-14 20:26 ` Scott Wood
2011-06-22 7:52 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2011-05-31 16:01 ` McClintock Matthew-B29882
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DF7BE43.1010407@freescale.com \
--to=timur@freescale.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=patrickdepinguin+linuxppc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).